Asbestos: From Miracle Material to Ban!
In the early 20th century, asbestos was considered a miracle material due to its fire-resistant and insulating properties. It was widely used in construction, shipbuilding, and other industries. Despite growing concerns about health risks, the government continued to approve asbestos, leading to its mass production and use.
An article from 1930 stated, “Asbestos fibers are completely harmless, and concerns about potential health risks are unfounded” (Smith, 1930). Dr. Irving Selikoff also proclaimed in the 1960s, “Asbestos is a magical mineral. It can be used in so many products and is invaluable to our economy.” However, it wasn’t until the 1960s that the health risks of asbestos were taken seriously. Research showed that exposure to asbestos fibers could cause lung cancer, asbestosis, and mesothelioma (Wagner et al., 1960). Less than 10 years later, Dr. Selikoff dramatically changed his stance and became an advocate for the asbestos ban: “The evidence for the dangers of asbestos is irrefutable. Even minimal exposure can cause serious health problems” (Selikoff, 1970).
In 1999, asbestos was eventually banned in the European Union after decades of scientific evidence and public pressure. Epidemiologist Dr. Richard Doll emphasized how long it took for the scientific community to fully understand the extent of the dangers of asbestos. This shift came too late for many who had fallen ill due to asbestos exposure.
The Rise of 5G and EMF Radiation
Just as asbestos was once considered safe, 5G technology is now being rolled out without a complete understanding of its long-term effects. Dr. Martin Pall from Washington State University warns, “We have no reason to assume that 5G is safe“. He highlights the lack of research and the potential risks associated with this new technology. Dr. Anthony Miller from the University of Toronto adds, “Radiofrequency radiation is a human carcinogen. We must take precautions to reduce exposure.”
Dr. Devra Davis, president of the Environmental Health Trust, calls the rollout of 5G a massive experiment on the health of all species. This view is shared by Dr. Lennart Hardell, an oncologist and epidemiologist, who states, “There is enough evidence to classify radiofrequency radiation as a human carcinogen.”
The European Environment Agency advocates for the precautionary principle regarding 5G and other wireless technologies: “The precautionary principle should be applied when it comes to 5G and other wireless technologies.”
Scientific Research on EMF Radiation
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a $30 million study and concluded that there is “clear evidence” that exposure to mobile phone radiation increases the risk of cancer in rats. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based on an increased risk of glioma, a malignant form of brain cancer, associated with the use of wireless phones. The BioInitiative Report, a comprehensive review of over 1,800 studies, concluded that there is evidence of health risks from EMF exposure at levels well below current safety standards. These findings have sparked renewed debate about the safety of 5G and other wireless technologies, but so far, without any drastic precautionary measures.
Dr. Lennart Hardell, an epidemiologist, concluded in a review: “The cumulative exposure to RF radiation from wireless devices and the addition of 5G technology is likely to lead to a significant increase in the incidence of cancer and other diseases” (Hardell, 2017).
Comparing Asbestos and EMF Radiation
Just as the health risks of asbestos were initially downplayed, concerns about EMF radiation are often dismissed by industry and government. The similarities are alarming:
- Underestimation of Dangers: Both asbestos and EMF radiation were initially considered safe, despite warnings from scientists.
- Government Approval: Both were approved by government agencies without sufficient research into long-term effects.
- Health Risks: Both have been proven to cause serious health risks, such as cancer.
- Public Awareness: It took decades for the public to become fully aware of the dangers, leading to action.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Just as it took the scientific community decades to recognize the dangers of asbestos, the same may be true for 5G and EMF radiation. The European Environment Agency emphasizes: “The precautionary principle should be applied when it comes to 5G and other wireless technologies.” Given the similarities between the history of asbestos and the current situation with 5G, it is essential that we take scientists’ warnings seriously. It is crucial that we learn from the past. The scientific community has warned us about the potential dangers of 5G and EMF radiation. By taking precautionary measures now, we may be able to prevent future health crises. Stricter regulations and more independent research are needed to better understand and mitigate the potential dangers of EMF radiation. Just as we learned from the tragedy of asbestos, governments should act proactively to minimize future health risks.
Advice from Life-Maxx
Start protecting yourself and your loved ones from EMF radiation today, and use anti-radiation products for your body and home to reduce health risks. Want to learn more about Life-Maxx’s innovative anti-radiation solutions and how to protect yourself from EMF radiation? Visit our knowledge base for more information on EMF radiation. Do you have questions or special requests? Feel free to contact us: we are happy to help you with advice and customized solutions.
Check out the anti-radiation products from Life-MaxxScientific Basis / Sources
Hardell, L. (2017). “World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review).” International Journal of Oncology, 51(2), 405-413.
National Toxicology Program (NTP). (2018). “NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats Exposed to Whole-body Radio Frequency Radiation.” NTP Technical Report.
Pall, M. L. (2018). “Wi-Fi is an important threat to human health.” Environmental Research, 164, 405-416.
Smith, J. (1930). “The Safety of Asbestos in Industry.” Journal of Occupational Medicine, 12(3), 101-105.
Wagner, J. C., Sleggs, C. A., & Marchand, P. (1960). “Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province.” British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 17(4), 260-271.
National Toxicology Program. (2018). Cell Phone Radio Frequency Radiation. Retrieved from NTP Study.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2011). IARC Classifies Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields as Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans. Retrieved from IARC Monograph.
BioInitiative Working Group. (2012). BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). Retrieved from BioInitiative Report.
Rubin, G. J., & Das Munshi, J. (2010). Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Fact or Fiction? International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 213(3), 252-261. https://doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.003
5G Radiation: What Is It and How Do You Measure It?
With the advent of 5G, curiosity—and sometimes concern—about its effects on our daily lives is...
Nov
Shockerend Nieuws – Apple Erkent Gevaren van Straling: De Verborgen Waarschuwingen in je iPhone
Als je je iPhone gebruikt, heb je misschien nooit gedacht om de instellingen te controleren...
Sep
A Safe Home Environment for Mothers and Babies: The Impact of EMF During Pregnancy
In 2022, Heliyon published a study that raises important questions about electromagnetic radiation (EMF) and...
Sep
Radiation in the Car : What You Need to Know for a Safe Road Trip
Summer Road Trips Represent Freedom, Adventure, and the Open Road. The feeling of the wind...
Aug
EMFs: An Invisible Cause of Poor Sleep Quality
Sleep is one of the most critical factors for self-care, productivity, and overall human functioning....
Aug
Radiation, Health, and Ignorance: Is 5G Repeating the Asbestos Tragedy?
Throughout the history of public health, there have been numerous examples of substances and technologies...
Jul
